Date: 2013-03-27 01:15 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I'd love to see a Loving vs. Virginia retrial featuring star witness President Obama as the child of a mixed-race marriage who was dooooooomed to failure.

Date: 2013-03-28 06:56 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] oh6
I am somewhat relieved to realize that this was likely prompted by a challenge to DOMA rather than an attempt to again legislate against interracial marriage.

Date: 2013-03-27 01:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] david wilford (from livejournal.com)
I'd love to see a Loving vs. Virginia retrial featuring star witness President Obama as the child of a mixed-race marriage who was dooooooomed to failure.

Date: 2013-03-27 12:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ilya187.livejournal.com
Well, that marriage DID fail...

Date: 2013-03-27 01:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sean o'hara (from livejournal.com)
And the child is an admitted drug user and the head of the world's largest criminal organization.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 02:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pperiwinkle.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 03:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2013-03-27 02:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
Scalia said today that the result in Loving was inherent in the intent of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. I think he was trying to trap the anti-Prop. 8 team into saying same-sex marriage was too so he could say nuh-uh, but they didn't take the bait.

Date: 2013-03-27 04:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chaotic-nipple.livejournal.com
But if I remember correctly*, the supporters of the 14th Amendment were very explicate that it wasn't. I suppose they _could_ have been lying to get it ratified, but that seems unlikely.

*Don't have textbooks accessible, too lazy to Google it.

Date: 2013-03-27 11:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
Scalia can tell they really intended that using his originalist mental powers.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bruce munro - Date: 2013-03-27 11:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 07:45 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-29 04:14 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-29 04:55 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] realinterrobang.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-29 10:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-30 03:25 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2013-03-27 02:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michael a. davis (from livejournal.com)
To be fair to Clarence Thomas, I do think he'd be on the side of the angels in this one. Probably.

Date: 2013-03-27 06:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] icecreamempress.livejournal.com
It would be rather bizarre of him to suggest that his own marriage wouldn't be Constitutionally valid in the state where he actually lives, so.

Date: 2013-03-27 12:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michael a. davis (from livejournal.com)
That's the joke, yes.

Date: 2013-03-27 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jaylake.livejournal.com
You're assuming intellectual consistency on the part of an American conservative, which is almost always a major mistake.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] agharta75.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 03:15 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] icecreamempress.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 05:20 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] icecreamempress.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 05:21 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mcbadger.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-30 09:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2013-03-27 05:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com
GODDAMMIT, WHAT BUSINESS HAS GOVERNMENT OR RELIGION GOT INTERFERING IN MARRIAGE?

Sorry, just had to get that out.

And yes, I do know about the whole social control and money issues, respectively, that got them in, salivating. But I'm a genuine conservative*, and marriage is a private matter of individuals' rights.



(*It is possible you may not know any others.)

Date: 2013-03-27 06:05 am (UTC)
avram: (Post-It Portrait)
From: [personal profile] avram
How do you keep government out of marriage?

In a property-based society, marriage has to be entangled with property rights, right? And government is also going to be entangled with property rights. So how do you keep those two things from touching?

Date: 2013-03-27 06:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maruad.livejournal.com
By owning nothing?

Date: 2013-03-27 06:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com
For a moment I thought you might be conflating the obligation of any government to protect property with its employees being granted the authority to decide who people may make private contracts with, but I'm sure nobody would willingly take such a position in public.

So I'm sorry for ascribing that to you, however briefly.

But as a result of my thinking being tainted by that shameful assumption, I can't figure out what you do mean.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] andrewducker - Date: 2013-03-27 08:28 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] izeinwinter.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 12:30 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] redbird - Date: 2013-03-27 01:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sean o'hara - Date: 2013-03-27 02:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2013-03-27 03:32 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] alexx-kay.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 05:29 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sean o'hara - Date: 2013-03-27 06:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 07:39 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dbdatvic.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-30 04:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-30 04:16 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dbdatvic.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-31 03:28 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-31 03:35 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 07:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rwpikul.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 08:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sean o'hara - Date: 2013-03-27 06:00 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2013-03-28 02:05 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] graydon saunders - Date: 2013-03-28 05:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2013-03-28 06:55 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 08:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] realinterrobang.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-29 10:15 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2013-03-30 04:37 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dbdatvic.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-30 04:10 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rwpikul.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 07:58 pm (UTC) - Expand

from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] raycun.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 10:52 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 01:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] carloshasanax.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 03:14 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] seth ellis - Date: 2013-03-27 03:52 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] nathan helfinstine - Date: 2013-03-27 05:51 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] seth ellis - Date: 2013-03-27 05:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] nathan helfinstine - Date: 2013-03-27 06:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] seth ellis - Date: 2013-03-27 07:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] nathan helfinstine - Date: 2013-03-27 08:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] raycun.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 09:39 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] seth ellis - Date: 2013-03-27 10:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] frilled-shark.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 10:03 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] raycun.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 10:18 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 03:35 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] joenotcharles.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 04:31 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 06:03 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] dbdatvic.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-30 04:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] scott-sanford.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 09:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] ice-hesitant.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 07:09 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] rwpikul.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 08:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: from the wikipedia page

From: [identity profile] ice-hesitant.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 08:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] avram - Date: 2013-03-27 06:05 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2013-03-27 11:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laetitia-apis.livejournal.com
It's the governments business to enforce contracts. It is not the government's business to write contracts, and it most particularly isn't the government's business to re-write the terms of a contract without consulting or even informing the participants.

Date: 2013-03-27 02:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keithmm.livejournal.com
Nice try, you True Scotsman, you.

Date: 2013-03-27 07:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com
Now that is an interesting and funny response.

Date: 2013-03-27 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmegaera.livejournal.com
Bless your furry little heart. And, no, I do not mean that in the Southern sense of the phrase.

Date: 2013-03-28 03:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com
I don't know that usage anyway.

It sounds awfully interesting, though.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] keithmm.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 03:37 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harvey-rrit.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 06:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dbdatvic.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-30 04:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2013-03-27 02:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
6:3. Scalia, Thomas, and Alito would be the dissent because it's about equality and they're a priori agin' it. Kennedy and Roberts aren't dumb enough to get caught on the wrong side of history, this far in - Kennedy's mostly internalised that other people are people, and Roberts would never want to be That Chief Justice forever.

(Fun fact: I keep wanting to say "Rogers", not "Roberts", while discussing the USSC. Chief Justice John Rogers would be a very different (and better) thing, I think. Chief Justice John Waters, also hilarious. John Rogers and John Waters co-starring in "Chief Justices: Together They Fight Crime" is a TV show I would watch.)

(These are the places my mind goes, sometimes)

Date: 2013-03-27 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sean o'hara (from livejournal.com)
6:3 what? This isn't a binary choice -- the Court has multiple options available to it, and given Kennedy's attitude during the arguments and Robert's unwillingness to rock the boat, we're looking at the narrowest possible ruling at best. More likely, they'll punt and decide that the Prop-8 supporters lack standing.

Date: 2013-03-27 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
The original question James posted was "If Loving v Virginia came up today, how do you think the vote would split?"

And my thought is that Loving v Virginia, in front of the USSC 2013, would rule the same way it did back then, 6:3.

And then I digressed off into Supreme Court Action Heros Starring Comedian/Writers And Cult Directors. Which I would still watch.

Date: 2013-03-27 06:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nathan helfinstine (from livejournal.com)
The "lacks standing" option seems to be the smart money among the lawyers I read. Or, if six Supremes agree, they can "dismiss as improvidently granted" and it'll be as if the Supreme Court had denied cert. in the first place, so the appeals court ruling will stand without precedential value outside of the one circuit.
Edited Date: 2013-03-27 08:40 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-27 11:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] keithmm.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 03:52 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] joenotcharles.livejournal.com - Date: 2013-03-28 07:03 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nathan helfinstine - Date: 2013-03-29 01:31 am (UTC) - Expand

Profile

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll

July 2017

S M T W T F S
       1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 2526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2017 12:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios