Page Summary
magedragonfire - (no subject)
ravenskyewalker - (no subject)
gothtique - I am excited!
dewline - (no subject)
heron61 - (no subject)
kore - (no subject)
solarbird - (no subject)- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
kaffyr - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Kabu no Isaki, book 6 by Hitoshi Ashinano
- 2: Saaaaaaaaavvvvvvveeee mmmmmeeeeeeee
- 3: Raven Stratagem (Machineries of Empire, book 2) by Yoon Ha Lee
- 4: Fig and the big window
- 5: On this day in 1945
- 6: Cue the lamentations of the broflakes
- 7: Strange Signals from the Nearby Red Dwarf Star Ross 128
- 8: The World at Bay by Paul Capon
- 9: Cowboys are 2017's lettuce
- 10: Fig and Ibid still need rehoming
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2017-07-16 11:55 pm (UTC)I stopped watching shortly after 12 came along (grumpy, sarcastic men do not do it for me as protagonists), but I might just give the new series a shot.
I do wonder, though - did the same fools complaining about how the show is RUINED FOREVER now have the same reaction about the Master's current incarnation? Why didn't they stop watching then? (Didn't she turn out to be one of the better things about the newest seasons, from what I've heard?)
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 01:25 am (UTC)Unlike magedragonfire, I love Capaldi's Doctor, and am apparently supposed to beg eternal forgiveness for not being a Tennant fan (but he reminds me of all the entitled, sleazy white boys I grew up with, whatever he's like in reality, so he wrecked modern DW for me). So, I've been going through quite the silly mourning process due to Capaldi leaving, and have been dreading Chibnall's takeover.
(Have been into DW since 1981. The Doctor has often been grumpy, cranky, sarcastic... so I guess people who single out Capaldi for being terrible don't know much about DW history? So terribly sorry, but he actually had psychological development over his three seasons -- but don't pay attention to me trying to convince anyone of anything.)
Even at my most feminist, I didn't want a female Doctor, because I wanted there to be a good non-stereotypically male role out there. However, I've changed over the years, and these days, I'm kind of into the idea that if it pisses off fandom, go for it, see how it works, and let's just marvel in the firestorm. I've loved Michelle Gomez as a female Master. Let's hope that Whittaker is a good Doctor.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 04:32 pm (UTC)I'm looking forward to the change to Chibnall because at least he's not Moffat, but that doesn't mean he can't crap the bed on his own. And the complete lack of women writers sure as fuck doesn't help. I love the character, I love the mythos, but goddamn it is such a boy's club.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 08:21 pm (UTC)I am excited!
Date: 2017-07-17 01:52 am (UTC)Some of it will depend on the writing.
I have heard rumors that her companion will be gay.
Either way. I am gonna watch it!
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 02:45 am (UTC)I stopped watching after Season 9, which had a surprisingly good finale but was IMHO self-indulgent and terrible for much of it, especially in episodes 10 & 11, but I'll give the new Doctor and showrunner a try and see if I get back into it.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 03:43 am (UTC)I don't think things really started downhill until after Amy and Rory left. I remember a number of people (who I mostly still disagree with) talking about the misogyny associated with how Amy Pond was written, but things with Clara started out barely OK and swiftly got worse with both 11 & 12.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 03:09 am (UTC)How DW became "an exercise in concentrated misogyny" when Clara was allowed to become an essentially immortal cosmic adventurer (which is apparently allowed when it's the Doctor, but not for a woman)... sorry, I don't get it. (All the anti-Moffat examples you can give me, I can give anti-RTD counterexamples, so let's not get into it here. And since you're apparently anti-"Heaven Sent," which I considered stunning work that had a lot of psychological resonance for me... nah, forget it.)
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 03:36 am (UTC)I've heard positive things about Season 9, but I've got enough bad feelings about Moffat & Moffat + Capaldi that I seriously doubt that I could give it a fair shake.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 04:04 am (UTC)Dude, I don't know if you mean to be, but you're coming off as really combative and also condescending. Really not everyone is going to agree with you about NuWho and you can't intimidate them into submission.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 06:38 pm (UTC)I've seen a few people say this, and I honestly don't understand it. Baker was 40 when he started, Davison 30, Baker 41, McCoy 44, McGann 37, Eccleston 41, Tennant 34, and Smith 26. At 35, Whittaker doesn't stand out from the crowd as being notable for her age.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-19 08:23 am (UTC)Well, a lot of people dislike the trend for younger Doctors and welcomed Capaldi as a nice return to form, so gender aside this would be disappointing for them. But I also think it has something to do with the way actors can get great roles into their sixties and even seventies, but actresses tend to go invisible as they approach 40 (if not before). An older female Doctor would have been a much bolder choice in that sense. There's also the way that male actors are actually allowed to *age*, to show wrinkles and "character" and gray hair, which helps audiences take them more seriously as characters with authority, experience and wisdom. But female actors have to maintain a much younger appearance in order to get hired/stay active.
I mean, David Tennant is 46 now, Eccleston is in his fifties, and both of them (and Capaldi) are still getting high-profile, meaty, interesting protagonist roles and probably will for the next 10 years, despite the fact that none of them are as perfectly flawless-looking as they were in their twenties. There just aren't that many comparably interesting, significant roles for 40 or 50-year old women, and even when there is an "older woman" role it's often played by a younger woman anyway-- there are a million examples of actresses cast in mother roles to actors less than ten years younger than they are, and even more extreme cases like Angelina Jolie playing Colin Farrell's mother in "Alexander" are not that rare. AJ and CF are literally the SAME AGE, but clearly the logic was "ugh, nobody wants to see some old lady, let's cast a young beautiful actress instead." I think Angelina Jolie is great, but c'mon.
Personally, I also worry that -- all other things being equal -- a script that is written for a younger, fresh-faced, somewhat blandly attractive female Doctor is going to be different than a script written for an older, somewhat crotchety, slightly witchy or stern-looking female Doctor. I don't want this Doctor to be a younger female Doctor AND suddenly become super nurturing and accommodating to everyone's feelings and blush and smile shyly when flirted with, or whatever. I worry that a young, attractive female Doctor won't be allowed to be properly weird and alien, just because it will *feel* alien for people to write those qualities into a female character. Hopefully not, though.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 08:19 pm (UTC)(I was so enthusiastic about him becoming showrunner, too, after his RTD-era scripts. I thought he'd be one of the best. I was... oh god so wrong.)
Also, Colin Baker has been an absolute lion about this on twitter, and it has been wonderful.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-18 03:17 pm (UTC)(I was never a big fan, but I thought the show was, leaving aside the execrable season finales, usually good enough that I didn't mind watching it and sometimes really quite good. And I'm married to a SUPERFAN so we watched it. And Moffat-as-showrunner managed to drive *her* off.)
no subject
Date: 2017-07-18 04:16 pm (UTC)RTD can draw you a character you believe in with one line of dialogue. His plots may've been a mess and his series finales (other than the first two) terrible, but goddamn, you believed those were people.
Moffat, by contrast, doesn't give fuck one about that and will have characters do whatever the hell he thinks they need to do in order to advance this latest God Damn I'm So Clever (But Not As Clever As I Think I Am) plot, no matter how completely bonkers and off-the-map it might be for them as people. The result is that everyone is a goddamn action figure being jerked around at whim, and you end up just not caring what happens, because they're some kid's action figures, not characters.
Moffat working under RTD meant RTD would fix those problems, so you got the best of both of 'em, and the result was brilliance. Without RTD... well.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-18 05:05 pm (UTC)Season 1: God appears and fixes everything.
Season 2: The History Eraser Button!
Season 3: If we pray REALLY loudly, God appears and presses The History Eraser Button!
Season 4: Hey, did you notice that establishing "regeneration can do anything" basically lets you use The History Eraser Button a lot more often? Like now? More than once?
Season 5: If we pray REALLY loudly, The History Eraser Button!
Season 6: Oh dear fuck this entire season was just up its ass the whole time and then The History Eraser Button!
Season 7,8,9: We'd given up. Sadly, Moffat had not. We popped in for a few episodes here and there when people said they were good, but they never were.
I read a really neat essay on how a couple of Capaldi-Doctor's speeches exemplify the problem of Moffat's writing: One of this Doctor's favourite themes is "you're asking the WRONG QUESTION" which almost always winds up meaning "Stop giving a shit about characters or continuity and stop looking for clues, because The Doctor is so much smarter that the real solution will be something the audience COULD NOT predict and that DOESN'T HAVE to be consistent with anything before, because fuck you, that's why." I'll see if I can dig it up.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-19 09:33 am (UTC)Do I remember the least bits about the mechanical plot? Eh, a little, whatever. Not important. Do I remember every emotional beat? Oh hell yes.
And that's why those two work so well for me, and for a lot of fans. After that, not anymore. So.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-19 11:32 am (UTC)And then they did it over and over again.
If the plot had actually been the Doctor saying "yes, yes, Daleks, Cybermen, The Master, whatever, shut up I'll fix them in a minute, the REALLY IMPORTANT things are here!" with everyone around him going "uh... no really this looks bad" before the Doctor ends the issue as dismissively as the writers did, that might have been better. Or it might not. I don't know: I mostly just know that it was "throw something at the screen, be disgusted at myself for spending time on it, need to be cajoled and convinced to give the next season a try by someone who also hated it but just not quite as much as I did."
no subject
Date: 2017-07-18 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-19 09:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-19 08:27 am (UTC)(Being So Clever is also one of the most notable qualities of Sherlock via Moffat & Gatiss, but it seems more appropriate there, what with the worshiping of the brilliant intellect inherent in those stories.)
no subject
Date: 2017-07-19 09:35 am (UTC)Also applies to Sherlock for me. So.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-19 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-07-18 02:48 am (UTC)